Make FireRescue1 your homepage. Older bunker gear may expose firefighters to harmful chemicals. One of the current hot topics around firefighter cancer is exposure to PFAS.
But what is PFAS, how are firefighters exposed, and how much do we know about their health effects? PFAS per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances have been used in a variety of industries, and are often present in food packaging, cleaning products and nonstick products. In animal-based studies, exposure to PFAS has been linked to adverse reproductive, developmental and immunological effects, and may be related to development of cancer.
We believe that firefighters may be exposed to PFAS through exposure to the combustion of products containing the substances on the fireground e. Firefighters may have also been exposed to PFAS through firefighting foam. PFOS was used in the manufacturing of firefighting foam through the earlys, although some foam that contains it may still be in service. Historically, PFAS also has been used in bunker gear, although in a form that has been considered a stable state. While the long-chain version of the chemicals have been eliminated in the production process, it is possible that legacy gear manufactured before the regulations were put in place still contain the legacy chemicals, and that current gear has a newer version of the chemicals that are still being studied.
Whether the chemical is then entering the body of firefighters from absorption, inhalation or ingestion from their bunker gear and, if so, how is unclear. Additional research is currently underway to understand the depth and breadth of the concern. It has also been suggested that the exposure may be due, in part, to the moisture barriers in gear.
While it has been assumed that the PFAS in the moisture layer of gear are stable, recent research by Dr. Peaslee at Notre Dame has found that the chemicals may be present on the outside of the gearbut it is unclear how they got there or where they are coming from. Research to understand exactly what risks PFAS poses to firefighters is in its infancy. His work and the work of other scientists will shed light onto the risks moving forward.
The pursuit to better understand this issue is progressing. The IAFF has partnered with a number of research teams to study the issue in depth and have taken steps to collect information from stakeholders on all sides of the topic. The peer-review process for publication of findings — the process where other scientists review the manuscripts before they are published — will also ensure that methods are appropriate and conclusions are sound.
In many ways, preventing the risks from PFAS exposure is similar to what is already being discussed related to cancer prevention. With that in mind, follow these four steps to help limit exposure:. It should be noted that there is no evidence that any specific types of cancers are linked solely to PFAS exposure.
Generally, limiting exposures as much as possible is important in addition to contamination control associated with gear. Other occupational risk factors that are modifiable — diet, obesity, sleep disruption, tobacco use, and binge drinking — become even more important to control given the chemical exposures firefighters encounter, as all these factors can influence the development of cancer.
PFAS exposure and risks: Your questions answered
Jahnke, Ph. She was the principal investigator on two large-scale, DHS-funded studies of the health and readiness of the U. She is a co-investigator of several studies focused on fitness, nutrition and health behaviors in firefighters.
She completed her doctorate in psychology with a health emphasis at the University of Missouri — Kansas City and the American Heart Associations' Fellowship on the Epidemiology and Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease.
Connect with Jahnke on LinkedIn or via email. More FireRescue1 Articles. More Cancer News. More Product Listings. More Product news. More Cancer Videos.Firefighting foam has been used since the s. Manufacturers use dangerous chemicals known as PFAS to make firefighting foam.
You may be able to seek compensation through a firefighting foam lawsuit if PFAS caused your cancer. Chemical-based firefighting foam has been sold for decades because of its effectiveness in extinguishing jet fuel and petroleum fires. However, it may cause various types of cancer — most notably kidney, testicular, and pancreatic cancer — in firefighters who were regularly exposed to the foam.
At particular risk are U. Firefighters assigned to airports are also at risk because airports required the use of the foam until If you or a loved one are a firefighter, were exposed to this foam, and later developed cancer, you may be entitled to compensation through a firefighter foam lawsuit.
Known officially as aqueous film-forming foam AFFFfirefighting foam creates a blanket that cuts off the fuel from the oxygen it needs to burn. To help smother the fire, chemicals known as Perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances PFAS were, and, in some circumstances, are still used. The highly durable nature of PFAS means they do not break down over time. Because of this, it may remain in the body for years.
Those who served as airport or military firefighters are at particularly high risk of PFAS exposure. Navy guidelines. The U. Navy and other branches of the military have used firefighting foam since the s, even during training exercises and non-critical missions. It was particularly favored since it could put out jet fuel fires. The military is currently phasing out the use of certain PFAS. The firefighting foam lawyers at Sokolove Law are currently investigating cases involving cancer after occupational exposure to firefighting foam.
If you or a loved one are a firefighter, have been exposed to these foams, and later diagnosed with kidney, testicular, pancreatic, or another type of cancer, you may wish to file an AFFF foam lawsuit against companies that made firefighting foam.
You may be able to receive financial compensation for your injuries.Cincinnati toxic tort attorney and Ohio product liability lawyer reviewing 3M firefighting foam cancer lawsuits for injured plaintiffs nationwide. Veterans and civilians at military bases may have been injured by toxic exposure. Veterans, civilian workers and residents living near military bases have filed 3M firefighting foam cancer lawsuits after suffering from various cancers and disorders allegedly due to toxic chemical exposure.
Plaintiffs have filed claims against the federal government and chemical manufacturers, saying they were responsible for warning about potential exposure risks and preventing injury and illness.
Class action 3M firefighting foam cancer lawsuits have been filed with product liability and toxic tort attorneys arguing that the Aqueous Film-Forming Foams AFFF firefighting foam used on many military and air force bases contained perfluorooctanoic acid PFOA and perfluorooctane sulfonate PFOSchemicals linked to groundwater contamination, cancer and other health problems.
Product liability, environmental damage and personal injury claims have been filed against:. Even is the 3M firefighting foam was made to military specification, it still had a duty to warn consumers and end users of known risks and prevented likely chemical exposure.
Product liability claims are forthcoming. But the current litigation against the government is more difficult because of governmental immunity. Affected residents and 3M firefighting foam cancer lawsuits are pushing harder against the manufacturers, who appear legally and ethically culpable. Joe Lyon is a highly-rated Cincinnati toxic tort attorney and Ohio product liability lawyer reviewing 3M firefighting foam cancer lawsuits for injured plaintiffs nationwide.
Veterans of military bases, Air Force bases and residents living nearby contaminated sites may have a legal claim against the government or manufacturer of a harmful product. Class action suits are pending alleging personal injuries and property damage. Affected individuals and families may have spent time in or around the following areas:. If you or a a loved one has suffered following toxic chemical exposure and have questions about the legal remedies available to improve quality of life and medical care in Ohio, contact The Lyon Firm at You will speak directly with Mr.
Lyon, and he will help you answer these critical questions regarding 3M firefighting foam cancer lawsuits. Veterans and civilians at military bases may have been injured by toxic exposure Veterans, civilian workers and residents living near military bases have filed 3M firefighting foam cancer lawsuits after suffering from various cancers and disorders allegedly due to toxic chemical exposure.
Product liability, environmental damage and personal injury claims have been filed against: 3M Co. Angus Fire The Ansul Co. The Buckeye Fire Protection Co. Legal Action: 3M Firefighting Foam Cancer Lawsuits Veterans of military bases, Air Force bases and residents living nearby contaminated sites may have a legal claim against the government or manufacturer of a harmful product. Like this: Like Loading Contact us today. Contact Free Consultation.Firefighting foam is used widely across the United States, but there is some evidence that this use may come at the cost of firefighter safety.
Some firefighters could potentially develop a condition known as AFFF cancer or firefighting foam cancer. There are many different tools that a firefighter might use in the course of carrying out his or her job. One of the most common is known as firefighting foamwhich serves the purpose of suppressing fires. While firefighting foam has been shown to be effective in fighting fires, it can come with significant risks for the firefighter using it.
Some firefighters could be at risk of developing cancer as a result of deploying firefighting foam in the course of their work. Some of the kinds of cancer associated with exposure to this foam include leukemia, kidney, testicular, lymphomaand bladder cancer. Firefighting foam has been used in the industry for over 60 years. Dangerous chemicals referred to as PFAS are used to make firefighting foam, and these chemicals have been associated with a higher-than-usual risk of cancer for people who are directly exposed to them.
Those firefighters who regularly used this foam on the job could face a higher risk of developing cancer. The foam was widely used through the military over the past six decades. Airport firefighters could also develop cancer since the foam was required in airport locations until However, the firefighting foam is still in use in some places today because of its effectiveness for suppressing fires.
The cancer-causing foam is currently under investigation in the military and could be banned byaccording to some reports.
If you developed cancer unexpectedly after working as an airport or military firefighter who regularly used this foam for training exercises or in actual fires, you might be able to file a lawsuit to assist with compensation. As more research comes out about the connection between firefighting foam and cancer, consider reviewing your own medical records. A firefighting foam cancer lawyer can help you. If you believe that you have developed cancer as a result of using this foam, a consultation with an experienced lawyer can help you to determine your next steps.
Top Class Actions can help you to identify an AFFF foam cancer attorney so that you can have your evidence and case reviewed. If you or someone you love developed cancer after being exposed to firefighting foam, you may have a legal claim. Fill out the form on this page now to find out if you qualify to participate in a free firefighting foam lawsuit investigation. Get a Free Case Evaluation. Top Class Actions Legal Statement. If you qualify, an attorney will contact you to discuss the details of your potential case at no charge to you.The firefighter foam lawyers at Bernstein Liebhard LLP are offering free legal reviews to civilian and military firefighters diagnosed with cancer following regular exposure to AFFF firefighting foam, especially:.
AFFF firefighting foam is used to extinguish fires driven by highly-flammable liquids, such as petroleum and jet fuel. AFFF has been used by military fire crews for approximately 60 years, and untilwas required for civilian airports across the United States. Because these toxic chemicals have been utilized in wide array of industries, they are persistent in the environment, including groundwater.
The U. Navy had other branches have used these firefighting foams since the s, even during training exercises and non-critical missions. Navy guidelines. A growing number of firefighter foam lawsuit plaintiffs claim that 3M and other manufacturers concealed the health and environmental risks associated with AFFF, including individuals who seek compensation for cancer and other personal injuries that allegedly resulted from PFAS exposure. Recently, all such federally-filed cases were consolidated before a single judge in the U.
District Court, District of South Carolina. You may be entitled to significant financial compensation if you or someone you love developed any form of cancer following regular and repeated exposure to AFFF firefighting foam. To learn if you qualify to file a firefighter foam lawsuit, please call or fill out the form on this page to arrange for your free, confidential, and no-obligation case review.
The health risks associated with firefighting foam and PFAS are now receiving high-profile attention. Further, companies that made firefighting foam are being sued by both individuals and communities. Firefighting foam is a combination of water, pressurized air, and PFAS. The mixture of these three substances is more effective at controlling fires than just water, particularly for fuel-based fires. However, unlike water and air, PFAS are man-made chemicals that do not break down over time.
Firefighters are at high risk if they are regularly exposed to foam containing PFAS. PFAS can also run off into local water sources without anyone realizing it. If humans consume water or food products contaminated with PFAS, they could develop serious health problems.
With repeated exposure, PFAS will build up in the body. Though anyone exposed to PFAS may be at risk, those who are continuously exposed may be more likely to develop health issues.
Several different industries heavily relied on firefighting foam for decades. The largest consumers were the military, airports, and fuel companies — not necessarily local fire departments.
Anyone working on or near these sites could be at risk if they are directly exposed to the firefighting foam or unknowingly consume water polluted by it. In addition, those who lived near a military base, airport, or fuel farm may also be in danger if PFAS from the firefighting foam contaminated a nearby water source.
Today, the companies that produced firefighting foams with PFAS are coming under legal and medical scrutiny. According to recent reports, some companies may have known about the health risks of their foams for decades but did not take sufficient action to protect the general public. Today, people are taking legal action against these companies, seeking compensation for the long-term damage that was done.
That being said, the problem is far from over. Some organizations will continue to use PFAS-containing firefighting foams throughand over products using the chemicals are still being sold on the market today. The military and airports are beginning to phase out the use of firefighting foams with PFAs as well, but progress is slow. However, this rule will not take effect until More steps must be taken at local and national levels to prevent firefighting foams from polluting the environment and to clean up sites that are still at risk.
The team strives to present the most accurate and relevant information for those who need legal help. Search for:. Firefighting Foam Exposure on Job Sites Several different industries heavily relied on firefighting foam for decades. Firefighting foam was used in: The U. The foam was used to put out aircraft and hangar fires and was also a staple of firefighting exercises until the mids.
Today, the military still has huge stockpiles of firefighting foam. Firefighting foam was specifically used because water is not as effective on fires started by jet fuel. Fuel Industries: Firefighting foam was a necessity for those working on fuel tank farms and refineries, as PFAS are particularly effective in fighting oil-based fires. Who Is Responsible?Are you a firefighter, military member or an airport worker who was exposed to aqueous film-forming foam AFFF and subsequently developed cancer?
If so, you may be eligible to file a firefighting foam lawsuit to seek compensation for your medical expenses and other damages. Toxic chemicals have reportedly been used to make firefighting foam for more than half a century. Although the firefighting foam is effective at stopping dangerous fires, the chemicals used to make the foam have been associated with significant firefighting foam health effects, including some types of cancer.
If you or someone you love developed cancer after being exposed to firefighting foam, you may have a legal claim. Fill out the form on this page now to find out if you qualify to participate in a free firefighting foam lawsuit investigation. Aqueous film forming foam or AFFF is used to fight flammable liquid fires.
It is effective because the foam creates a sort of blanket that smothers the fire and prevents it from getting the oxygen it needs to burn. AFFF is primarily used by the military, airports and firefighters.
Many fire departments have discontinued their use of firefighting foam, but many military bases in the United States continue to use it. PFAS chemicals refer to perfluoroalkyl substances and polyfluoroalkyl substances. They are known as C-8 chemicals because they have a strong 8 carbon atom chain, which are difficult to break down naturally.
Once released into the environment, AFFF chemicals may contaminate soil, surface water and groundwater.Toxic Firefighting Foam
The chemicals may also enter drain systems which can carry the chemicals to remote locations. A federal inquiry reportedly determined in that PFAS were more dangerous than initially reported. This determination led to the revision of recommendations for safe levels of AFFF exposure.
Firefighter Foam Lawsuit
Several types of cancer have been associated with the toxic chemicals that make up firefighting foam, including:. If you are a military member, firefighter, airport worker or if you worked in another type of capacity that put you at risk of AFFF exposure and you developed cancer, you may be eligible to file a firefighting foam lawsuit to secure compensation for your medical expenses and other losses. The following occupations are considered among those at the highest risk of AFFF exposure because they are more likely to have worked directly with the PFAS chemicals in the course of manufacturing the products or using them to fight fires:.
Residents living in areas near firefighter foam application or AFFF disposal are also at risk of experiencing firefighting foam health effects. Other concerns about AFFF exposure relate to the risk of groundwater contamination or the contamination of municipal water supplies in areas that have been affected by firefighting foam.
People who live in areas with PFAS contamination have also found that the value of their homes decreased significantly.
In such cases, homeowners may wish to sell their home and move away from the contaminated area but struggle to sell the home because of the health risks associated with PFAS contamination. The 3M Company, which manufactures and sells AFFF, has been blamed for contaminated drinking water near military bases at which the firefighting foam was used.
The company is currently facing multiple class action lawsuits in which the plaintiffs argue that 3M and the other defendants knew that AFFF posed significant risks to human health but continued to market the products anyway.
Dozens of firefighting foam lawsuits have been consolidated into multidistrict litigation. Tyco Fire Products, Chemguard, Buckeye Fire Equipment and National Foam are also facing litigation for continuing to manufacture the product despite knowing about potential firefighting foam cancer risks.